Population growth or population control? The organization'from
Population problemsfrom
"In terms of defending individual human rights, especially women's rights, forcing human rights restrictions for moral reasons. However, there is no doubt that population growth does raise ethical issues that balance the balance between reproductive rights and social and environmental responsibility, we demand People consider these issues.
Population Growth and Intergenerational Ethics
The current growth [10.000 more per hour] will one day stop, just because a limited planet cannot sustain countless people, which is a fact rather than an opinion. But it can only be stopped in one of two ways: a: sooner or laterfrom
: a humanitarian approach, by reducing childbirth, brought about by family planning, made available by policy support and encouraging people to use it, or b: laterfrom
: A natural way of death caused by famine, disease and plunder/war. The athletes who oppose the former are actually campaigning for the latter. We should prevent this for our children.
International morality Population growth is not just a problem for poor countries. The UK population is expected to grow by 10 million over the next 22 years. That is '10 more Birmingham '. England is already the most overcrowded country in Europe, and its income far exceeds the share of our planet's natural resources. Each of us hurts the planet far more than any poor African. For example, each additional Briton has a carbon footprint of 22 Malawians. We should also stabilize our numbers [and our resource consumption] with others and then reduce them to sustainable levels.
The ethical implication of the big family If two people with two living children have a third child, this is also a fact, not an opinion, they will increase the population on the planet, thus exacerbating the damage to the environment and making the days of serious ecological failure even more Approach and reduce others' reduction in the shrinking share of natural resources to cope with population growth. Therefore, they decided to create an entire additional life cycle that affects everyone else - far more than any other decision they made to damage the environment. We need to understand the ethical implications of population growth due to having a large family. School sex education should cover this topic.
Humanitarian ethics About 220 million women worldwide do not have access to family planning, and 40% of pregnancies are unintentional. About 50,000 people die each year from unsafe abortions; women who die from pregnancy-related causes are equivalent to four complete jets crashing every day. The close relationship between high fertility rates and high maternal and child mortality rates has been established. Mothers who earn $1 a day know that if there are three children around the table instead of ten, then the family will get better feeding. Universal family planning is "Millennium Development Goal 5b" and the lack of mandatory pregnancy can be considered an abuse of women's rights. A UNICEF statement said: "Family planning can bring more benefits to more people at a lower cost than any other known technology." Limiting population growth should be a very important priority.
Inter-species ethics The recent population explosion since the Industrial Revolution has led to the "sixth global extinction" of human beings currently occupying, degrading, polluting and destroying wildlife habitats. Other creatures have the right to occupy the Earth as we do.
Political ethics For these reasons, the UK government should set a national goal as soon as possible, by non-mandatory means to stabilize UK population growth, then to reduce UK population growth to sustainable levels, and to place family planning and women's education and empowerment programs first. Development aid budget. from
Limiting population growth should be a very important priority.from
.
Orignal From: The ethical implication of population growth
No comments:
Post a Comment