Straight to understand the facts
Recently, when I noticed that I finally received customer reviews on Amazon, I was checking my sales ranking for books on Amazon.com. After reading the comments, I found myself humble and stupid. The customer who reviewed my saber and hand-in-hand book was obviously an practicing martial artist.
He also seems to be one of the "understand all" types. Although most of his comments on the layout of my book may be live; I don't know the difference between aggressive training and martial arts, he is surprised by his public ignorance. In his own words from
"Although the author may already know what he did in this book, you may already know. If you have participated in any type of MA course for a certain period of time, then you may learn most, if not Half of the skill of the knife." I must agree with him.
If you are attending a martial arts class at any time; it is worth it; you may learn half of the skills in the book. Although I clearly pointed out in the book, my attempt is not to teach specific skills, but to use technology as a tool to promote family principles; I admit that there are countless technologies that can be learned, not just my books. This guy "cliff" is an example of how much difference between martial arts and combative training can't be distinguished.
Distinguish differences
Before truly distinguishing between martial arts or combative training, they must reflect on the origins of practicing martial arts today. The term "martial arts" refers to wars like art; it refers to war with military. A long time ago, in today's martial arts concept, countless systems and styles were born from military exercises and close combat at the time. In ancient times, without the help of modern weapons and firepower, soldiers were forced to fight with sticks, swords, daggers, spears, and often played against each other. The warriors of those times began to develop reliable and authentic systems of armed and unarmed combat, just like today. They know that military units must gain muscle memory in the tactics they choose and see the battle system that requires rules. Their methods and techniques at the time required solving problems by getting on and off the horse and breaking or penetrating the wooden armor. Obviously, these technologies will be outdated in today's battle environment. After several generations and centuries, ancient art has been taught from Master to students, and Master has passed on to students. The once effective and powerful ancient combative training has become an age.
Today, the ancient techniques of the samurai and the Chinese fighting monks can be seen through the windows of the training halls around the world. The ancient forms and techniques of once-combat combat tactics were manipulated by mass media and commercial ideology. Many people practice ancient martial arts for various reasons. Some of these reasons are the same as those for training development. People practice fitness, protection and hobbies. Others just train to preserve art.
After the Second World War, the West was introduced to the Asian martial arts boom. Soldiers, sailors and pilots came into contact with Asian fighting art in Japan and the Philippines and wanted to learn. Many indigenous teachers or masters realized the opportunity to earn money from innocent Westerners and began to teach a faded version of the art of combat. Often, masters take out training and add flashy, complex and complex techniques to the course. Lightning will be sold to new Western markets. Soon, even Hollywood will make movies with actors like Bruce Lee and Chuck Norris to show their athleticism and strength on the screen.
A belt ranking system has been added to help new students feel as if they are progressing rather than exiting. The ancient fighting techniques that were once effective were simplified into acrobatics with certain self-protection value. Through the simple supply and demand process, the pride of many ancient warriors has been lost. Modern technology and weapons can only help to lose practical combat technology and turn martial arts into a lucrative but provocative industry. Today some martial arts companies place their customers in a program called the Black Belt Project.
People were forced to sign contracts, and they could not rest for a certain period of time until they received the black belt. In the early 20th century, many people respected the "black belt" level because they maintained their combat effectiveness. Today, this level has lost a lot of aspects. We often hear about the black belt that was defeated by boxers or street fighters. Leucoed students often eliminate their "black belt" karate or kung fu masters when they are training in the training hall. Today, mixed martial arts has proven that even today's modern training methods, ancient martial arts are outdated. Today's MMA athletes have no belts in any martial arts and will occupy more than half of traditional martial arts practitioners.
Traditional martial artists often rely on ancient training methods and spiritual philosophy in the more primitive times. MMA athletes rely on the latest drilling and science training ideology. Today, people learn more about psychology, physiology, anatomy, physics, and sports economics. The lack of state-of-the-art science makes most traditional combat art obsolete and inefficient. In essence, tradition itself makes many martial arts training methods effective and inefficient. Now that we have determined the martial arts, we should compare it with today's modern battle.
Today's aggressive training is the product of military machines. Today's army is more efficient and productive than any other army in history. The idea of creating a war machine with minimal power. In the Second World War, Eric Anthony Sykes and William Fairbairn began developing a new type of training for soldiers based on their experience in Shanghai and the trenches of the First World War. from
[CQB] Or holding a battle is the normal state of battle, and the soldiers who fight it need to be able to kill and fix their opponents quickly and effectively. The two realized that they needed to build a system of training or training ideology, which would enable a large number of soldiers without martial arts experience to quickly learn one-on-one battles within a few days, rather than the years that martial arts often need. Art training. This type of training requires not only rapid learning, but also rapid retention and training. Soldiers on the front and rear lines need to be able to react without thinking, relying on muscle memory. In combat, the heart rate exceeds 180 beats per minute and all fine motor skills disappear.
Sykes and Fairbairn realize that many luxury goods "pressure point" It is not effective for traditional martial arts. They realized that there are two reasons why the pressure point is invalid. First, the enemy may not feel it under the influence of adrenaline and two people; soldiers may not have the fine motor skills required to hit the target. Since then, modern combat training has been easy to retain and concentrated on the large motor skills movement. Because soldiers are often deprived of sleep and undernutrition during combat, the skills taught are not dependent on physical or athletic ability. Today's aggressiveness is often known for its dirty battles, not in traditional martial arts. A long time ago the warrior code no longer applies today, the knight spirit is dead. Because the aggressive technique teaches a variety of combatants, their bodies are not adapted to desensitization training; students can only use the most stable physical weapons to strike. A soldier can't stand the broken hands and feet on the battlefield. For many of these reasons, aggressive training is a far cry from traditional martial arts.
In summary
The traditional martial arts practiced today is actually combative training for its army. As with time changes, so is training. Society has become more educated; moral values and codes have been changed. During the traditional martial arts conception, the world does not lead or participate in mysticism as spiritually. The aggressive techniques that have been effective in their time have evolved into an art form of mystery and ancient legends; modern media is enhanced. Today's combative training is based entirely on modern science and the need for efficiency. Adherence to these rules is critical to combative training.
- Must teach simple general principles
- Can't rely on power or athletic ability
- The point is to destroy anything the principal is in contact with.
- Sport efficiency and economy
- Ability to learn and apply in a very limited time from
[day or week]
in conclusion
Today's combat training definitely includes many people learning skills in traditional martial arts if they attend classes at any time. One might think that two types of training are steaks. One is a fat-filled chuck, which is unnecessary and may clog your treaty, the other is lean hybrid, which only contains the necessary nutrients to make you...
Orignal From: The difference between confrontation training and martial arts
No comments:
Post a Comment