What I find interesting is that many people are uncomfortable with this idea. Perhaps their God may be someone else's opinion of the devil himself, and the movie "Golden Compass" seems to think that the traditional idea of good and evil may have problems. . No one likes their religious beliefs to be questioned. When it happens, most people feel frustrated or offended, and even show shock.
But what they forget is that religion is based on your beliefs, if you believe, "This is true." But for me this is just a bad logic. If you think about it pragmatically, you will find that just because you believe does not mean that everyone believes. This only means that you believe in it.
Phillip Pullman [the author of the recently released children's film "Golden Compass"] does not believe in God. Many people say that his book is to cultivate children's atheism. First of all, they are fictitious. Second, when you think about it in a practical way, they are just the right representation of today's religious differences.
Throughout history, the definition of good and the definition of evil have changed many times. The only constant is that they are antagonistic. Good is not evil and evil is not good. But when you think that millions of people have objections and definitions about everything from plant life to decoration, this is not very helpful. So, when you bring some surreal and intangible things to the controversy stage, you'd better prepare for the show.
The only important definition is that we personally determine the definitions that apply to our personal lives. My definition of good and evil is useful to me. It explains my world. Your definition of good and evil may not be suitable for my world.
This does not mean that the rest of the world is wrong. In most world religions, there are 10 to 50 different groups in the religion or "convincing", and others in the "big umbrella" of their religion are wrong.
The problem is; be a pragmatic thinker. How can it be? This is in addition to hundreds of world religions, not even worshiping the same "God" or not worshiping any "God" at all.
Therefore, saying that your religion is challenged, or that goodness may be really evil, evil may indeed be good, not just logical thinking, but the way things are; it reflects today's reality. Faith or faith is an interesting thing.
I can believe that God is a radish. If I believe it is long enough and strong enough, I can actually see my life change and see the great miracle [unexplained events are explained by my beliefs] because I am against me. Dedication of the radish. Radish can actually give me a lot of happiness and great blessings, because I believe. I can pray for radishes and radishes to respond to my prayers. I can love my radish, my radish [God] can love me. If I believe it is... that is.
Please don't "challenge my deep religious belief in radish. This kind of radish will bring such great happiness to my life. I don't want to listen. Therefore, we choose the god of worship and faith, and our concept of good and evil.
For example, "killing in the name of God" is good. But who is good for you? Of course not a dead person. The dead will think this is evil I believe. Therefore, if God is in a mixed state, we really don't know what is good and what is bad, let alone good and evil. Your faith in God has changed everything. Therefore, "One person's God is another person's devil. Can they all be right?"
Orignal From: One's God is another person's devil - the pragmatics behind the golden compass controversy
No comments:
Post a Comment